Privacy, information security, and risk management leaders across the public and private sectors worked together to establish a set of safeguards for protecting the security and privacy of protected health information (PHI) and electronic PHI (ePHI). The HITRUST CSF consists of 49 control objectives across 156 control specifications, all of which fall into one of the following 14 control categories:
Recognizing the increasing importance of information and communication technologies (ICTs) to national security, economic well-being, and social cohesion, ITU created its CIIP as a model for sharing the responsibility between government, business, other organizations, and individual users.
Cobit 5 For Information Security Pdf Free 23
SAML is a standard that defines a framework for exchanging security information between online business partners. Developed by the Security Services Technical Committee, SAML is an XML-based framework that supports business communications for user authentication, entitlement, and attribute information. Organizations can apply it to human and machine entities, partner companies, or other enterprise applications. Organizations most often use SAML for web single-sign-on (SSO), attribute-based authorization, and securing web services.
Abstract:Businesses are reliant on data to survive in the competitive market, and data is constantly in danger of loss or theft. Loss of valuable data leads to negative consequences for both individuals and organizations. Cybersecurity is the process of protecting sensitive data from damage or theft. To successfully achieve the objectives of implementing cybersecurity at different levels, a range of procedures and standards should be followed. Cybersecurity standards determine the requirements that an organization should follow to achieve cybersecurity objectives and facilitate against cybercrimes. Cybersecurity standards demonstrate whether an information system can meet security requirements through a range of best practices and procedures. A range of standards has been established by various organizations to be employed in information systems of different sizes and types. However, it is challenging for businesses to adopt the standard that is the most appropriate based on their cybersecurity demands. Reviewing the experiences of other businesses in the industry helps organizations to adopt the most relevant cybersecurity standards and frameworks. This study presents a narrative review of the most frequently used cybersecurity standards and frameworks based on existing papers in the cybersecurity field and applications of these cybersecurity standards and frameworks in various fields to help organizations select the cybersecurity standard or framework that best fits their cybersecurity requirements.Keywords: cybersecurity framework; cybersecurity standard; information security framework; information security standard; cybersecurity requirements; information security requirements; narrative review
While the modern world is gearing towards an environment of several emerging technologies, including Consumerisation, Cloud Computing, Social Media, Big Data and Mobility, information and IT is easily the new currency. Technology ensues massive volumes of information chunks to be easily supported and managed. This raises the success rate of businesses, but at the same time raises other challenging and complex management and governance concerns for the security professionals, enterprise leaders, and governance specialists. New businesses demand that risk scenarios are better met with the power of information. COBIT 5.0 is the exact solution the modern businesses are asking for.
While the modern world is gearing towards an environment of several emerging technologies, including consumerization, cloud computing, social media, big data, and mobility, information and IT is easily the new currency. This raises the success rate of many organizations, but at the same time raises other challenging and complex management and governance concerns for security professionals, enterprise leaders, and governance specialists. New businesses demand that risk scenarios are better met with the power of information. COBIT 5.0 is the exact solution the modern businesses are asking for.
We often come across discussions related to comparisons of different governance standards and frameworks, such as ISO 27001 and COBIT. ISO 27001 focuses on information security controls, while on the other hand, COBIT, which is a governance framework, also includes some ISO 27001-related topics such as security, risks, managing changes, etc. in its domains. This article explains the definition and similarities and differences between ISO 27001 and COBIT.
ISO 27001 is the ISO standard that describes how to manage information security in an organization. It consists of 11 clauses in the main part of the standard, and 114 security controls grouped into 14 sections in Annex A. ISO 27001:2013 clauses from the main part of the standard are:
The key difference between ISO 27001 and COBIT is that the first one is solely for the purpose of information security, and the second one is for management and governance of information technology business processes.
The main benefit of implementing ISO 27001 is a systemic Information Security Management System that helps with the identification of critical information, the information security risk assessment of the system, and the implementation of security controls, all of which help to create a secure culture in the organization.
As explained in this article, ISO 27001 is an international standard focusing only on security, while COBIT has a wider scope, focusing on information technology governance, though security is also part of the framework.
Hence, if your target is to protect the information assets of your organization by implementation of appropriate and relevant security controls, then go for implementation of ISO 27001. However, if you are looking for an information technology governance and management model for the business process owners and managers to improve business process management, while enhancing the value delivered from your IT business and managing IT risks, then go for the COBIT framework.
ISO/IEC 27002:2005 establishes guidelines and general principles for initiating, implementing, maintaining, and improving information security management in an organization. The objectives outlined provide general guidance on the commonly accepted goals of information security management. ISO/IEC 27002:2005 contains best practices of control objectives and controls in the following areas of information security management:
Even before the terrorist attacks of September 2001, concerns had been rising among securityexpertsabout the vulnerabilities to attack of computer systems and associated infrastructure. Yet, despiteincreasing attention from federal and state governments and international organizations, the defenseagainst attacks on these systems has appeared to be generally fragmented and varying widely ineffectiveness. Concerns have grown that what is needed is a national cybersecurity framework --a coordinated, coherent set of public- and private-sector efforts required to ensure an acceptable levelof cybersecurity for the nation.As commonly used, cybersecurity refers to three things: measures to protectinformationtechnology; the information it contains, processes, and transmits, and associated physical and virtualelements (which together comprise cyberspace ); the degree of protection resulting fromapplicationof those measures; and the associated field of professional endeavor. Virtually any element ofcyberspace can be at risk, and the degree of interconnection of those elements can make it difficultto determine the extent of the cybersecurity framework that is needed. Identifying the majorweaknesses in U.S. cybersecurity is an area of some controversy. However, some componentsappear to be sources of potentially significant risk because either major vulnerabilities have beenidentified or substantial impacts could result from a successful attack. -- in particular, componentsthat play critical roles in elements of critical infrastructure, widely used commercial software,organizational governance, and the level of public knowledge and perception about cybersecurity.There are several options for broadly addressing weaknesses in cybersecurity . They includeadopting standards and certification, promulgating best practices and guidelines, using benchmarksand checklists, use of auditing, improving training and education, building security into enterprisearchitecture, using risk management, and using metrics. These different approaches all havedifferent strengths and weaknesses with respect to how they might contribute to the development ofa national framework for cybersecurity. None of them are likely to be widely adopted in the absenceof sufficient economic incentives for cybersecurity.Many observers believe that cyberspace has too many of the properties of a commons formarket forces alone to provide those incentives. Also, current federal laws, regulations, andpublic-private partnerships appear to be much narrower in scope than the policies called for in theNational Strategy to Secure Cyberspace and similar documents. Some recent laws doprovideregulatory incentives for corporate management to address cybersecurity issues. Potential modelsfor additional action include the response to the year-2000 computer problem and federal safety andenvironmental regulations. Congress might consider encouraging the widespread adoption ofcybersecurity standards and best practices, procurement leveraging by the federal government,mandatory reporting of incidents, the use of product liability actions, the development ofcybersecurity insurance, and strengthened federal cybersecurity programs in the Department ofHomeland Security and elsewhere. This report will be updated in response to significantdevelopments in cybersecurity. 2ff7e9595c
Comments